Further reading
History, background and analyses of the conflict
- Chorbajian, Levon (ed.) The making of Nagorno-Karabagh: from secession to Republic (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave, 2001)
- Croissant, Michael. The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict: causes and implications (London: Praeger, 1998)
- De Waal, Thomas. Black garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through peace and war (New York: New York University Press, 2003)
- Libaridian, Gerard. Modern Armenia. People, Nation, State (New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers, 2004)
- Lynch, Dov. Engaging Eurasia’s separatist states: unresolved conflicts and de facto states (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2004)
- Rasizade, Alec. ‘Azerbaijan after Heidar Aliev’ Nationalities Papers, vol. 32, no. 1 (March 2004): 137-164
- Yunusov, Arif. Islam in Azerbaijan (Baku: Friedrich Ebert Foundation/ Institute of Peace and Democracy, 2004)
Peace processes
- Betts, Wendy. ‘Third party mediation: an obstacle to peace in Nagorno Karabakh’ SAIS Review, vol. 19, no. 2 (1999): 161-183
- Caspian Studies Programme. ‘Negotiations on Nagorno-Karabagh: where do we go from here?’ (Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, 23 April 2001)
- Dehdashti, Rexane. ‘Nagorno-Karabakh: A Case Study of OSCE Conflict Settlement’ in Michael Bothe, Natalino Ronzitti and Allan Rosas (eds.) The OSCE in the maintenance of peace and security (The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1997)
- Druckman, Daniel & Terrence Lyons. ‘Negotiation processes and postsettlement relationships: comparing Nagorno-Karabakh with Mozambique’ in William Zartman & Victor Kremenyuk, Peace versus justice: negotiating forward-and backward-looking outcomes (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005)
- Faber, Mient-Jan & Andrzej Kasprzyk. ‘How should the OSCE deal with the Nagorno Karabakh conflict?’ Helsinki Monitor, vol. 14, no. 1 (2003): 1-6
- Gamaghelyan, Philip. ‘Intractability of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: a myth or reality?’ Peace & Conflict Monitor, Special Report, July 2005.
- International Crisis Group. ‘Nagorno-Karabakh: viewing the conflict from the ground’ (Tbilisi/Brussels: Europe Report, no. 166, 14 September 2005)
- International Crisis Group. ‘Nagorno-Karabakh: a plan for peace’ (Tbilisi/Brussels: Europe Report, no. 167, 11 October 2005)
- Laitin, David & Ronald Suny. ‘Armenia and Azerbaijan: thinking a way out of Karabakh’ Middle East Policy, vol. 7, no. 1 (October 1999): 145-76
Other themes
- Faber, Mient Jan & Mary Kaldor. ŒStudy Group on Europe‚s Security Capabilities: South Caucasus Paper‚ (London School of Economics, Centre for the Study of Global Governance, draft paper, 2004)
- Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. Azerbaijan. Seven Years of Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh (New York: Human Rights Watch, 1994)
- Human Rights Watch. Crushing Dissent. Repression, Violence and Azerbaijan’s Elections (New York: Human Rights Watch, January 2004)
- Human Rights Watch. Cycle of Repression: Human Rights Violations in Armenia (New York, Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper, 4 May 2004)
- Kaufman, Stuart. ‘peacebuilding and Conflict Resolution in Nagorno Karabakh’, (PONARS Policy Memo 164, University of Kentucky, 2000)
- Matveeva, Anna. 2002 ‘Nagorno Karabakh: A Straightforward Territorial Conflict’ in Paul van Tongeren, Hans van de Veen & Juliette Verhoeven (eds.) Searching for peace in Europe and Eurasia: overview of conflict prevention and peacebuilding activities (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002)
- Article 19. Under lock and key: freedom of information and the media in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia (London: Article 19, 2005)
- Panossian, Razmik. ‘The irony of Nagorno-Karabakh: formal institutions versus informal politics’ Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 11, no. 3 (2001): 143-164
- Tsalik, Svetlana. Caspian Oil Windfalls: Who Will Benefit? (New York: Open Society Institute, 2003)
- Tchilingirian, Hratch. ‘Nagorno-Karabakh: transition and the elite’ Central Asian Survey, vol. 18, no. 4 (1999): 441-445
Public opinion surveys
- Azerbaijanian Sociological Association. Armenian-Azeri Mutual Perception Project. Country Report on the “Potential of Azerbaijanian and Armenian Peoples in Peacebuilding and Post-Conflict Cooperation” Survey in Azerbaijan (Baku: Azerbaijanian Sociological Association/American University, 2003)
- Baku Press Club, Yerevan Press Club. The Karabakh Conflict and Prospects for Settling it. The results of sociological research and media coverage of the Karabakh settlement problem (Baku: Yeni Nesil, 2004)
- Stepanakert Press Club, Friedrich Ebert Foundation (Berlin) and Center of Social Technologies (Yerevan). Mountainous Karabakh in the mirror of public opinion (Stepanakert: Stepanakert Press Club, 2004)
News websites
- ANS: http://www.ans-dx.com
- Armenia Liberty: http://www.armenialiberty.org
- ArmeniaNow.com: http://www.armenianow.com
- BBC Karabakh page [Russian]: http://news8.thdo.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/in_depth/2004/karabakh/
- BakuToday.net: http://www.bakutoday.net
- EurasiaNet: http://www.eurasianet.org
- Institute for War and Peace Reporting: http://www.iwpr.net
- Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty: http://www.rferl.org
Peacebuilding websites
- Consortium Initiative: http://www.consortium-initiative.org
- South Caucasus Parliamentary Initiative: http://www.scpi.org.ge
Top | Nagorny Karabakh | Contents
